{"entry":270,"type":"pre_action_verdict","created_at":1790788492,"pubkey_hex":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","event_id":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","proof_event":{"id":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","pubkey":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","created_at":1790788491,"kind":30078,"tags":[["d","invinoveritas-proof-4cb6226a802b18b7239c5c52093988894a22a2b465cf384759557be626d447ea-1790788491-fa6edaa4"],["t","invinoveritas"],["t","proof"],["schema","invinoveritas.verdict_proof.v1"]],"content":"{\"artifact_hash\":\"4cb6226a802b18b7239c5c52093988894a22a2b465cf384759557be626d447ea\",\"artifact_type\":\"analysis\",\"canonicalization_version\":\"rfc8785.v1\",\"confidence\":0.86,\"conformance_suite\":\"https://github.com/babyblueviper1/preaction-governance-conformance\",\"context_provenance\":\"caller_asserted_unverified\",\"decision_ref\":\"sha256:87fc7bce26e64f00fb1f8f1123fb744a1601fe371aeffcdc7fd4aba5bd3c609b\",\"decision_ref_preimage_fields\":[\"artifact_hash\",\"artifact_type\",\"policy_version\",\"verdict\",\"source_class\",\"vantage_limitation\",\"related_decision_ref\",\"intended_audience\",\"confidentiality_tier\",\"disclosed_summary\",\"intended_verifier\",\"policy_commitment\",\"verified_at\",\"registry_as_of\",\"registry_snapshot_sha256\",\"action_binding_tool_hash\",\"action_binding_args_hash\",\"action_binding_agent_id\",\"action_binding_nonce\",\"freshness_beacon_hash\",\"epistemic_basis\",\"external_evidence_hash\",\"canonicalization_version\",\"related_claims_hash\",\"related_claims_result\",\"related_claims_comparison_version\",\"mediator_attestation_hash\"],\"decision_ref_preimage_rule\":\"every name in decision_ref_preimage_fields is a key in the hashed preimage object, always -- absent fields (e.g. vantage_limitation when not applicable) are present as JSON null, never omitted from the object.\",\"engine_generation\":1,\"epistemic_basis\":null,\"freshness_beacon\":{\"block_time\":1790788429,\"hash\":\"00000000000000000000b5350a89f5b205dc70781012e6ab1af6fd1bf1254749\",\"height\":969323,\"source\":\"bitcoin\"},\"freshness_beacon_hash\":\"sha256:f3a9d8c5d8ec4e77b86f8e705cba0c57519643131bd181b8f442d1501a6aee30\",\"independent_nodes\":[\"https://invinoveritas-castra.babyblueviper.workers.dev/verify\",\"https://babyblueviper1--2aba75da693711f185891607ee4eb77e.web.val.run\"],\"key_id\":\"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7\",\"platform\":\"invinoveritas\",\"policy_commitment\":\"sha256:ce58857dea9f9851394bd3126f9aca28b8ef7cc95cc3562ab0e4a863f8be73fe\",\"policy_commitment_inputs\":{\"conformance_suite_commit\":\"e90948ed3eb9d36eb1d0997ea4d02045e28a405a\",\"conformance_suite_repo\":\"babyblueviper1/preaction-governance-conformance\",\"rubric_doc_path\":\"docs/policy_spec/invinoveritas.review.v12.md\",\"rubric_sha256\":\"bb74afa68bd5e8b1ca1038d8f0c8cd9a0d1f83888a7ea7df7c551f579a974180\"},\"policy_version\":\"invinoveritas.review.v22\",\"registry_as_of\":null,\"registry_snapshot_sha256\":null,\"related_claims_result\":\"not_supplied\",\"review_model_hash\":\"deda3dc02a1d1575f15d5c9f9b3e31cf0c768a55508c31e7ff0f4fc8f33fc669\",\"review_prompt_template_hash\":\"13a72a4c1e3a99b969ac46b724eceef6620716292f2b730f19915cdd469c1e31\",\"schema\":\"invinoveritas.verdict_proof.v1\",\"source_class\":\"agent_reported\",\"summary_hash\":\"a9e892ba2131426d4206d77e32f44f229bac3d5ed4a82b6dac6e98569989461f\",\"verdict\":\"approve_with_concerns\",\"verified_at\":1790788491,\"verifier_keys\":\"https://api.babyblueviper.com/.well-known/verifier-keys.json\",\"verifier_pubkey\":\"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7\",\"verify_how\":\"Easiest: install the offline verifier above and recompute locally. Or POST this proof's signed `event` to verify_url (or an independent_node), OR run NIP-01 yourself: recompute the Nostr event id = sha256([0,pubkey,created_at,kind,tags,content]), verify the schnorr signature against verifier_pubkey. valid ⇒ invinoveritas issued this, untampered. No trust required.\",\"verify_offline\":\"npm i invinoveritas-verify  ·  pip install invinoveritas-verify  — recompute this proof on your own machine against verifier_pubkey; you never have to call us.\",\"verify_url\":\"https://api.babyblueviper.com/verify-proof\"}","sig":"3d4362bd8d4334fe23c34d9b9146b7c93002350875c98b6ad0003e8c1355265b16efc9217254657af47219e127435eed02ba9bd19db386b37ade53e6a3feebd5"},"record":{"ledger":"invinoveritas verdict ledger","entry":270,"type":"pre_action_verdict","title":"Forward verdict: OpenAI Decisions API reaches GA without a third-party-verifiable per-decision record (resolves at GA, by 2026-12-31)","what":"A SIGNED, artifact-bound verdict committed and published BEFORE its outcome exists. The schnorr signature binds the verdict + a hash of the exact reviewed artifact to our published key; the entry is Bitcoin-anchored (OTS) while still unsettled, so the anchor provably PRECEDES the outcome. Verify via POST /verify-proof or NIP-01, with no trust in us. Outcome will be appended in place at /ledger/{n}/outcome when the action resolves.","verdict":{"verdict":"approve_with_concerns","confidence":0.86,"summary":"The claim is directionally well-scoped: it distinguishes ordinary provider-controlled logs from independently verifiable decision evidence and supplies a fallback resolution date. Its settlement criteria remain materially ambiguous around what qualifies as \"without trusting OpenAI,\" what documentation snapshot controls at GA, and what constitutes an equivalent mechanism.","issues":[{"severity":"high","category":"correctness","description":"\"A third party can verify without trusting OpenAI\" is not a determinate technical standard: a signature made with an OpenAI-controlled signing key still requires trust that OpenAI correctly issued and protects that key, while it can independently verify message integrity and provenance. This ambiguity can cause disputants to reach opposite resolutions for the same signed receipt.","suggested_fix":"Define the required property as publicly verifiable cryptographic binding of a canonical question/options/choice payload to an OpenAI-published verification key, while explicitly stating that this does not establish decision correctness or remove trust in OpenAI as issuer."},{"severity":"high","category":"missing_check","description":"\"Official API reference / docs at GA\" has no fixed evidence snapshot or definition of GA. Documentation can be revised after launch, different endpoint versions can reach GA on different dates, and a marketing GA announcement may precede or follow the reference update; this makes the resolving corpus and time contestable.","suggested_fix":"Specify the controlling source and snapshot rule: e.g., the publicly accessible official API reference for the Decisions endpoint, archived at the timestamp of OpenAI's first explicit GA announcement, or the official docs as accessed at 23:59 UTC on 2026-12-31 if no such announcement exists."},{"severity":"medium","category":"correctness","description":"\"Equivalent third-party-checkable record\" is underspecified. A documented signed HTTP response header, detached receipt endpoint, transparency-log inclusion proof, or webhook-delivered signed artifact may satisfy the intended protection despite not being a JSON response field, whereas the opening sentence specifically says the response will not include a record.","suggested_fix":"Resolve FALSE if official documentation provides any documented response field, response header, receipt endpoint, or log-inclusion proof that cryptographically binds the canonical request payload and result and is verifiable with publicly available verification material; otherwise resolve TRUE."},{"severity":"medium","category":"intent_mismatch","description":"The conclusion that deployers \"will have to build that record themselves\" is broader than the evidence criterion. Absence of an OpenAI-native attestation does not establish that deployers must build cryptography themselves; they could use a third-party audit/logging service, a trusted execution environment, or an external transparency log.","suggested_fix":"Narrow the conclusion to: \"Deployers will not receive an OpenAI-provided independently verifiable decision record and must supply an external recordkeeping or attestation layer if they require one.\""}]},"proof":{"event_id":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","pubkey":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","artifact_sha256_in_event":true,"how_to_verify":"POST /verify-proof with this Nostr event, or run NIP-01; the artifact_hash binds it to the exact artifact reviewed."},"outcome_status":"pending — settles when the action resolves","ts":1790788492},"posted_at":1790788492,"relays":["relay.damus.io","nos.lol","relay.primal.net"],"posted":true,"chain":{"prev_head_hash":"04467b72e3231f1deb61e1e15741674e226e3aece0892800d7fc7ace2e7a108d","content_hash":"9302ec73f7a5deb12e61f5abf0fb06c34fb98428dd17e9312aef4156a248c20f","head_hash":"74b8191eab06497424934729cede888c91dbaa5096efdbe08e0ca96adb517adf"},"chain_head_relays":["relay.damus.io","nos.lol","relay.primal.net","offchain.pub","relay.nostr.net","nostr.mom","relay.snort.social"],"ots_anchor":{"mechanism":"opentimestamps-bitcoin-pow","digest":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","digest_meaning":"the verdict's signed Nostr event_id, stamped as the OTS digest directly","status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"precedence_basis":"stamped pre-outcome — entry unsettled and fresh at stamp time","calendars":["https://a.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://b.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://a.pool.eternitywall.com","https://ots.btc.catallaxy.com"],"stamped_at":"2026-09-30T17:28:04Z","ots_path":"/data/track_record/ots/878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1.ots","verify":"ots verify -d 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","bitcoin_block_height":969330,"confirmed_at":"2026-09-30T18:30:07Z","bitcoin_block_time":1790791189,"bitcoin_block_hash":"000000000000000000020bfa958f6467096b5f9d57769016130de6379434e382","ots_proof_url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/ledger/270/ots"},"relay_anchor":{"checked_at":1792657245,"relays_holding":["nos.lol","relay.damus.io","relay.primal.net"],"status":"anchored"},"commitment_proof":{"mechanism":"nostr-relay-publication","event_id":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","signed_at":1790788491,"published_at":1790788492,"relays":["relay.damus.io","nos.lol","relay.primal.net"],"how_to_check":"fetch the event by id from any listed public relay and confirm created_at; relays held the signed verdict from published_at, before the outcome settled","relay_anchor":{"checked_at":1792657245,"relays_holding":["nos.lol","relay.damus.io","relay.primal.net"],"status":"anchored"},"ots_anchor":{"mechanism":"opentimestamps-bitcoin-pow","digest":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1","digest_meaning":"the verdict's signed Nostr event_id, stamped as the OTS digest directly","status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"precedence_basis":"stamped pre-outcome — entry unsettled and fresh at stamp time","calendars":["https://a.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://b.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://a.pool.eternitywall.com","https://ots.btc.catallaxy.com"],"stamped_at":"2026-09-30T17:28:04Z","ots_path":"/data/track_record/ots/878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1.ots","verify":"ots verify -d 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","bitcoin_block_height":969330,"confirmed_at":"2026-09-30T18:30:07Z","bitcoin_block_time":1790791189,"bitcoin_block_hash":"000000000000000000020bfa958f6467096b5f9d57769016130de6379434e382","ots_proof_url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/ledger/270/ots"},"timing":{"hierarchy":"Bitcoin PoW (OpenTimestamps, trust-maximal) > original relay copy (tightest time) > on-chain committedAt > survivor floor (ERC-8299 Appendix B)","tier":0,"timestamp":1790791189,"claim":"Bitcoin proof-of-work (OpenTimestamps): the verdict event_id provably existed by this block's timestamp, anchored to a clock no chain operator or our key can move or back-date. Trust-maximal; the relay tier gives a tighter time on weaker trust.","available":{"tier0_btc_pow":1790791189,"tier1_relay_attested":1790788491,"tier2_onchain_committed_at":null,"tier3_survivor_floor":null},"btc_pow":{"status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"bitcoin_block_height":969330,"bitcoin_block_time":1790791189,"verify":"ots verify -d 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1 878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","note":"trust-maximal anchor, un-forgeable Bitcoin proof-of-work — pre-outcome precedence","precedence_cross_check":null},"committed_at":null,"committed_at_reference":"judgment_type=outcome_verifiable (ERC-8274): committed_at MUST predate the realized outcome's settlement. committed_at is the tier-2 on-chain committedAt sourced from the ERC-8263 proofHash leg (see truthanchor_8263) — distinct from the ERC-8281/OCP input anchor, which commits the input, not the verdict."},"judgment_type":"outcome_verifiable"},"judgment_execution":{"spec":"JudgmentExecutionAttestation — ERC-8299 L4 composition (reviewed→executed commitment; origin t/28655 #11)","hash_alg":"sha256","raw_proposal_hash":"4cb6226a802b18b7239c5c52093988894a22a2b465cf384759557be626d447ea","verdict_ref":{"binding":"nostr-event","event_id":"878947b01741cbcccc9d8bc24d520425e62c749cae3347855c1a72b7913b96f1"},"verdict_timestamp":1790788492,"executed_action_hash":null,"status":"entry predates executed-intent commitment wiring; action_taken is disclosed in the record and the outcome settled on-chain, but no separate executed-action hash was committed at the time (not backfilled by design)"},"outcome_evidence":{"question":"was the verdict later right or wrong? (distinct from commitment_proof's 'was it committed before the outcome was known?')","mechanism":"on-chain-settlement","account":"0x3b2A858806Fa4DEb9191Bb7918350fDB774603A4","note":"every governed trade settles on this public Hyperliquid account; the signed trade-outcome digest entries below contain the settled rows published at/after this verdict — wins AND losses","settled_digests":[],"status":"pending"}}